Arxiv Paper Latex Template Assignment

If you have questions regarding paper submission and submission system (CMT), please send an email to submission_support@eccv2016.org.

Deadlines for authors

  • Submission Deadline: March 14, 2016 – 23:59 PST

Author instructions for paper formatting

Please refer to the following files for detailed formatting instructions.

We strongly recommend the use of LaTeX. An MS Word template is also available here, together with a detailed pdf file describing how to use it.

A complete paper should be submitted using the above templates, which are blind-submission review-formatted templates.

Papers with more than 14 pages (excluding references) will be rejected without review.

Instructions on online paper submission

Step 1: Create a user account on the CMT paper submission site

  • Please follow this link to sign up as a new user on CMT.
  • Make sure that your browser has cookies and Javascript enabled.
  • Please add “cmt@microsoft.com” to your list of safe senders (whitelist) to prevent important email announcements from being blocked by spam filters.
  • Fill in your contact information. You can edit your contact information at any time (see item near the top right in the submission site). Don’t forget to click the “Update” button to save the edited information.
  • Note: If you need to change your contact email address, please contact the ECCV2016 program chairs
  • Note: If you have been invited to review for ECCV 2016, an account has been automatically generated for you using the contact email as your account name (regardless of whether you agreed to review or not). You need to only request for a new password via “Reset your password”. If you have agreed to review, please follow the reviewer login instructions.
  • Note: If you have generated an account and have forgotten your password, just click on “Reset your password”. Instructions will be emailed to you.

Step 2: Enter the domain of ONLY your current institution

  • The first time you log on to CMT you will be asked to enter your “Conflict Domains”.
  • Please only enter the domain of the academic department or institution where you currently work or study (example: cs.toronto.edu). If you worked or studied at more than one institution in the past year, please enter the domain of each institution separated by semicolons (example:cs.washington.edu; microsoft.com).
  • If your institution is a university, please enter the domain of your academic department rather than the whole university (i.e., enter cs.washington.edu rather than washington.edu)
  • DO NOT enter the institution domain names of your current or past co-authors: only your institution should be entered. ECCV 2016 will use a different mechanism to identify collaborator conflicts which does not rely on the information you enter on CMT.
  • DO NOT enter the domain of your email provider such as gmail.com, yahoo.com, hotmail.com, 163.com as your institution domain.

For each paper you want to submit, do the following:

Step 3: Enter a title and abstract

Click on the link “Create a new Paper Submission”.  You will then be asked for the paper title and abstract.  Your title can be up to 512 characters in length. The maximum size of the abstract is 4000 characters.

You can edit the title and abstract at any time up to the submission deadline.

Step 4: Add your co-authors

If your submission has co-authors, you will need to associate them with your submission:

•          Check with your co-authors if they already have an ECCV 2016 account on CMT. If so, please make sure you enter the email address that corresponds exactly to their account name. It is important that each person uses exactly one account as author, reviewer, or area chair for ECCV 2016. This will ensure that they can see your submission when they log onto CMT and allow us to handle conflicts appropriately.
•          Only if a co-author does not have an ECCV 2016 account you should create an account: If the email address you enter does not correspond to an existing CMT account for ECCV 2016, you will be asked to enter your co-author’s information (name, institution, etc.).

Step 5: Select one primary subject area for your paper

•          Subject areas are organized hierarchically in two levels.  You can choose the primary subject area from either the top-level or the lower level. Select the most appropriate subject area from the list. Try to be as specific as possible.
•          Pay extra attention to this choice, as it is important in allowing us to properly assign papers to reviewers.

Step 6: Include your paper ID

Once you have registered your paper (i.e. title, subject areas, area chairs, etc), you will be assigned a paper ID by CMT. Insert this ID into the latex template before generating the PDF of your paper for submission.

Step 7: Upload your paper’s PDF

•          Paper formatting instructions can be found in the body of the example paper found here.
•          Only PDF files are accepted (maximum size 30MB).
•          Make sure that your paper’s ID appears on every page in the PDF.

Step 8: Optionally upload a supplementary materials file

•          The ECCV 2016 policy on supplementary materials can be found here.
•          Only one PDF or ZIP file is accepted with a maximum size of 100MB.
•          You can update this file by uploading a new one (the old one will be deleted and replaced) until the submission deadline.
•          The paper for review (PDF only) must be uploaded before the supplementary material (PDF or ZIP only) can be uploaded.

Instructions on supplemental material

Authors may optionally upload supplementary material (up to 100MB) which may include:

  • videos to showcase results/demo of the proposed approach/system,
  • images and other results in addition to the ones in the paper,
  • anonymized related submissions to ECCV or other conferences and journals, and
  • appendices or technical reports containing extended proofs and mathematical derivations that are not essential to the understanding of the submitted paper.

ECCV encourages authors to submit videos using an MP4 codec such as DivX contained in an AVI. Also, please submit a README text file with each video specifying the exact codec used and a URL where the codec can be downloaded.

Authors should refer to the contents of the supplementary material appropriately in the paper. Note that reviewers will be encouraged to look at it, but are not obligated to do so. Please note that:

  • All supplementary material must be self-contained in a single file for upload (i.e., a single pdf, or a zip file containing multiple items).
  • The supplementary material directly supports the paper as submitted prior to the paper deadline. Only results generated by the algorithm/approach/system reported in the submitted version are allowed. Material based on improvements subsequent to the paper deadline is not allowed.
  • DO NOT include links to external files or websites (e.g., youtube). Including such links is grounds for automatic rejection without review.
  • DO NOT submit a newer version of the paper as supplementary material. Including a newer version of the paper or any portion thereof  is forbidden.

Policies

Review Process: By submitting a paper to ECCV, the authors agree to the review process and understand that papers are processed by the Toronto system to match each manuscript to the best possible chairs and reviewers.

Confidentiality: The review process of ECCV is confidential. Reviewers are volunteers not part of the ECCV organisation and their efforts are greatly appreciated. The standard practice of keeping all information confidential during the review is part of the standard communication to all reviewers. Misuse of confidential information is a severe professional failure and  appropriate measures will be taken when brought to the attention of ECCV organizers. It should be noted, however, that the organisation of ECCV is not and cannot be held responsible for the consequences when reviewers break confidentiality.

Double blind review: ECCV reviewing is double blind, in that authors do not know the names of the area chair/reviewers of their papers, and the area chairs/reviewers cannot, beyond reasonable doubt, infer the names of the authors from the submission and the additional material. Avoid providing information that may identify the authors in the acknowledgments (e.g., co-workers and grant IDs) and in the supplemental material (e.g., titles in the movies, or attached papers). Avoid providing links to websites that identify the authors. Violation of any of these guidelines may lead to rejection without review. If you need to cite a different paper of yours that is being submitted concurrently to ECCV, the authors should (1) cite these papers, (2) argue in the body of your paper why your ECCV paper is non trivially different from these concurrent submissions, and (3) include anonymized versions of those papers in the supplemental material.

Note that we will be actively checking for plagiarism.

Dual/Double Submissions: By submitting a manuscript to ECCV, authors acknowledge that it has not been previously published or accepted for publication in substantially similar form in any peer-reviewed venue including journal, conference or workshop. Furthermore, no paper substantially similar in content has  been or will be submitted to a journal, another conference or workshop during the review period (March 14, 2016 – July 1, 2016). The authors also attest that they did not submit substantially similar submissions to ECCV 2016. Violation of any of these conditions will lead to rejection.

The goals of the dual submission policy are (i) to have exciting new work be published for the first time at ECCV, and (ii) to avoid duplicating the effort of reviewers.

Our policy is based upon the following particular definition of “publication”. A publication, for the purposes of the dual submission policy, is defined to be a written work longer than four pages that was submitted for review by peers for either acceptance or rejection, and, after review, was accepted. In particular, this definition of publication does not depend upon whether such an accepted written work appears in a formal proceedings or whether the organizers declare that such work “counts as a publication”.

Note that such a definition does not consider an arXiv.org paper as a publication because it cannot be rejected. It also excludes university technical reports which are typically not peer reviewed. However, this definition of publication does include peer-reviewed workshop papers, even if they do not appear in a proceedings, if their length is more than 4 pages including citations. Given this definition, any submission to ECCV should not have substantial overlap with prior publications or other concurrent submissions.

As a rule of thumb, the ECCV submission should contain no more than 20 percent of material from previous publications. Authors are encouraged to contact the Program Chairs about clarifications on borderline cases.

Note that a Technical Report (departmental, arXiv.org, etc.) version of the sumbission that is put up without any form of direct peer-review is NOT considered *prior art* and should NOT be cited. Likewise, mentioning a work under review in a presentation is NOT considered a violation.

Please note that the acceptance of the paper to the ECCV requires that at least one of the authors registers for the conference before 25 July 2016  and present the paper there.

Accepted papers will be published by Springer (with appropriate copyrights) electronically up to three weeks prior to the main conference, i.e. from 15 September 2016 onwards. Please make sure to discuss this issue with your legal advisors as it pertains to public disclosure of the contents of the papers submitted.







All submissions will be handled electronically via the conference's CMT Website. All authors must agree to the policies stipulated below. The submission deadline is Friday November 14th and will not be changed. Supplementary material can be submitted until Friday November 21st. Papers are limited to eight pages, including figures and tables, in the CVPR style. Additional pages containing only cited references are allowed. Please refer to the following files for detailed formatting instructions:
A complete paper should be submitted using the above templates, which are blind-submission review-formatted templates. The length should match that intended for final publication. Papers with more than 8 pages (excluding references) will be rejected without review. Note, unlike in previous CVPRs, there will be no page charges.

It is the primary author's responsibility to ensure that all authors on their paper have registered their institutional conflicts into CMT. For each author, please enter the domain of his/her current institution (example: cs.jhu.edu; microsoft.com). Please enter ONLY ONE institution, except when the author was in more than one institution in the last 12 months (Nov 15, 2013 - Nov 14, 2014). DO NOT enter the domain of email providers such as gmail.com. This institutional conflict information will be used in conjunction with prior authorship conflict information to resolve assignments to both reviewers and area chairs. If a paper is found to have an undeclared or incorrect institutional conflict, the paper may be summarily rejected.




By submitting a paper to CVPR, the authors agree to the review process and understand that papers are processed by the Toronto system to match each manuscript to the best possible chairs and reviewers.

CVPR reviewing is double blind, in that authors do not know the names of the area chair/reviewers of their papers, and area chairs/reviewers do not know the names of the authors. Please read Section 1.6 of the example paper egpaper_for_review.pdf for detailed instructions on how to preserve anonymity. Avoid providing information that may identify the authors in the acknowledgments (e.g., co-workers and grant IDs) and in the supplemental material (e.g., titles in the movies, or attached papers). Avoid providing links to websites that identify the authors. Violation of any of these guidelines may lead to rejection without review. If you need to cite a different paper of yours that is being submitted concurrently to CVPR, the authors should (1) cite these papers (preserving anonymity as described in Section 1.6 of the example paper egpaper_for_review.pdf), (2) argue in the body of your paper why your CVPR paper is non trivially different from these concurrent submissions, and (3) include anonymized versions of those papers in the supplemental material.

Note that we will be actively checking for plagiarism.

By submitting a manuscript to CVPR, authors acknowledge that it has not been previously published or accepted for publication in substantially similar form in any peer-reviewed venue including journal, conference, workshop, or archival forums. Furthermore, no paper substantially similar in content has been or will be submitted to another conference or workshop during the review period (November 14, 2014 - March 2, 2015). The authors also attest that they did not submit substantially similar submissions to CVPR 2015. Violation of any of these conditions will lead to rejection.

The goals of the dual submission policy are (i) to have exciting new work be published for the first time at CVPR, and (ii) to avoid duplicating the effort of reviewers.

Our policy is based upon the following particular definition of “publication”. A publication, for the purposes of the dual submission policy, is defined to be a written work that was submitted for review by peers for either acceptance or rejection, and, after review, was accepted. In particular, this definition of publication does not depend upon whether such an accepted written work appears in a formal proceedings or whether the organizers declare that such work “counts as a publication”.

Note that such a definition does not consider an arXiv.org paper as a publication because it cannot be rejected. It also excludes university technical reports which are typically not peer reviewed. However, this definition of publication does include peer-reviewed workshop papers, even if they do not appear in a proceedings, as long they are eligible for rejection. Given this definition, any submission to CVPR should not have substantial overlap with prior publications or other concurrent submissions.

As a rule of thumb, the CVPR submission should contain no more than 20 percent of material from previous publications. Consider the following examples of previous work with regard to the dual submission policy:
  • A NIPS Deep Learning workshop paper with substantial overlap. This would be a violation of the dual submission policy, since this workshop either accepts or rejects papers based upon peer review. It is a violation despite the declaration of workshop organizers that papers in this workshop do not count as publications.
  • A short ICLR workshop paper on the same topic. If the paper is so short that a CVPR submission would provide substantial additional novelty, details, and background, such a submission could be allowable.
  • An arXiv.org paper on the same topic. Because this paper is not peer-reviewed for acceptance or rejection, it would not qualify as a prior publication for the dual submission policy, and thus would not prevent the submission of a substantially similar CVPR paper.
Authors are encouraged to contact the Program Chairs about clarifications on borderline cases.

An extended version of a paper submitted to CVPR (with sufficiently new material) can be submitted to a journal anytime after the CVPR's submission deadline (even before a final decision on the paper is sent to the authors). An author submitting an extended version of a CVPR paper to a journal needs to ensure that the paper (a) satisfies all submission requirements of the intended journal and (b) does not violate any copyright with IEEE. Authors may also wish to notify the CVPR program chairs of their journal submission.

Note that a Technical Report (departmental, arXiv.org, etc.) that is put up without any form of direct peer-review is NOT considered a publication and is therefore allowed, but should NOT be cited. Likewise, mention of the work under review in a presentation is NOT considered a violation. For further information, please refer to Section 8.2.4.F of the IEEE PSPB Operations Manual.

All accepted papers will be made publicly available by the Computer Vision Foundation (CVF) two weeks before the conference. Authors wishing to submit a patent understand that the paper becomes of public domain after the final (camera-ready) version is submitted. More information about CVF is available at http://www.cv-foundation.org/

The authors agree that if the paper is accepted, at least one of the authors will register for the conference and present the paper there.




Authors may optionally upload supplementary material, which may not fit in the PDF size limit and may include:
  • videos to showcase results/demo of the proposed approach/system,
  • images and other results in addition to the ones in the paper,
  • anonymized related submissions to other conferences and journals, and
  • appendices or technical reports containing extended proofs and mathematical derivations that are not essential to the understanding of the submitted paper.
CVPR encourages authors to submit videos using an MP4 codec such as DivX contained in an AVI. Also, please submit a README text file with each video specifying the exact codec used and a URL where the codec can be downloaded.

The authors should refer to the contents of the supplementary material appropriately in the paper. Note that reviewers will be encouraged to look at it, but are not obligated to do so. Please note that:
  1. All supplementary material must be self-contained and zipped into a single file. The following formats are allowed: avi, doc, docx, mp4, pdf, wmv. CMT imposes a 100MB limit on the size of this file. Note that you can update the file by uploading a new one (the old one will be deleted and replaced).
  2. The paper for review (PDF only) must be submitted first before the supplementary material (PDF or ZIP only) can be submitted.
  3. Please make sure that the supplementary material directly supports the paper as submitted prior to the paper deadline. ONLY results generated by the algorithm/approach/system reported in the submitted version are allowed. Material based on improvements subsequent to the paper deadline is not allowed.
  4. Do not submit a newer version of the paper as supplementary material. A newer version of the paper or portion thereof, with description of an improved algorithm/approach/system or even one spelling or typo correction, is not allowed.

    • Submission Site (bookmark or save this URL!)
    • Please make sure that your browser has cookies and Javascript enabled.
    • Please add "cmt@microsoft.com" to your list of safe senders (whitelist) to prevent important email announcements from being blocked by spam filters.

  1. If you have been invited to review for CVPR2015, an account has been automatically generated for you using the contact email as your account name (regardless of whether you agreed to review or not). You need to only request for a new password via "Reset your password". If you have agreed to review, please follow the reviewer login instructions.

    If you have not been invited to review for CVPR2015, you are not in the system. Please sign up as a new user. If you have generated an account and have forgotten your password, just click on "Reset your password". Instructions will be emailed to you.

  2. When you log in for the first time, you will be asked to enter your conflict domain information. You will not be able to submit any paper without entering this information. We need to ensure conflict-free reviewing of all papers.

  3. At any time, you can edit your contact information (see item near the top right in the submission site). Don't forget to click the "Update" button to save the edited information. If you wish to change the contact email address, you can modify it via the "Change your Email" box.

  4. When you submit a paper, you will be asked to specify its associated subject areas. Please note that you only need to indicate one "primary" subject area.

  5. For each author, please enter the domain of his/her current institution (example: cs.jhu.edu; microsoft.com). Please enter ONLY ONE institution, except when the author was in more than one institution in the last 12 months (Nov 15, 2013 - Nov 14, 2014). DO NOT enter the domain of email providers such as gmail.com.

  6. Once you have registered your paper (i.e. title/authors), you will be assigned a paper number. Insert this into the latex or word template before generating the pdf of your paper for submission. Papers submitted without a number may not be reviewed.

    • The maximum size of the abstract is 4000 characters.
    • The paper must be PDF only (maximum 30MB).
    • The supplementary material can be either PDF or ZIP only (maximum 100MB).
    • If your submission has co-authors, please make sure that you enter their email addresses that correspond exactly to their account names (assuming they have created accounts). This will ensure that your co-authors can see your submission when they log in. Co-authors must also have their conflict domains entered.




  • Can we please have an extension on the deadline?
    NO. And any incomplete submission or a submission not meeting required criteria will be deleted.
  • Can we get my quota increased for the size of paper submission from 30 MB to something higher?
    NO. We have set hard limits of 30MB (PDF Only) for paper submission and 100MB (PDF or ZIP only) for supplementary materials for submissions for review. As we are expecting many submissions, and as each reviewer is expected to review (on average) about 10 papers, we feel that larger file downloads (and uploads) will tax the system and abilities of reviewers to get to the papers fast enough. Authors should consider adding hi-res images as supplementary material. See Supplementary Material.
  • How do I delete Supplementary Material from the CMT site?
    We have added a feature that allows authors to remove supplementary files. After you log in, in the "Author" console, you'll notice "Upload/Delete File" at the end of the supplementary file name. Click on that, and in the page that appears, you can click on the "Delete" button to remove the supplementary file. (Please note that you will not be able to delete the supplementary file after the supplementary file deadline.)
  • Can we submit color images with our papers for review?
    YES. Reviewers will get the exact pdf file of the paper you submitted, so they can see the color images on the screen. Do be warned though that many reviews still like to read printed papers and not all have access to high-end color printers. Please make sure to comment in the paper to request the reviewers to see the color online copy.
  • What is CVPR 2015 policy on DUAL SUBMISSIONS?
    Please read the dual/double submission paragraph above.
  • Does a Technical Report (departmental, arXiv, etc.) with publication available online count as a prior publication, and therefore is that work ineligible for review and publication at CVPR 2015?
    Please read the dual/double submission paragraph above.
  • Does a presentation at a departmental seminar during the review period violate the anonymity standard or other CVPR 2015 policy?
    NO. Authors must properly anonymize the written submission as per the guidelines. There is no requirement that the material otherwise be kept confidential during the review process.


  • Is the CVPR 2015 Review Process CONFIDENTIAL?
    YES, CVPR 2015 Reviewing is considered confidential. All reviewers are required to keep every manuscript they review as confidential documents and not to share or distribute materials for any reason except to facilitate the reviewing of the submitted work.
  • Are CVPR 2015 Reviews Double BLIND or Single BLIND?
    CVPR reviewing is Double BLIND, in that authors do not know the names of the area chair/reviewers of their papers, and area chairs/reviewers do not know the names of the authors. Please read Section 1.6 of the example paper egpaper_for_review.pdf for detailed instructions on how to preserve anonymity. Avoid providing information that may identify the authors in the acknowledgments (e.g., co-workers and grant IDs) and in the supplemental material (e.g., titles in the movies, or attached papers). Avoid providing links to websites that identify the authors. Violation of any of these guidelines will lead to rejection without review.





0 thoughts on “Arxiv Paper Latex Template Assignment”

    -->

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *